<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.oddstreak.com/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
 <title>Scream When You're Winning: Football blog | Asian handicap predictions</title>
 <link> http://www.oddstreak.com</link>
 <description>Football blog | Asian handicap predictions - Last Updated: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:24:14 +0800 </description>
 <language>en-US</language>
 <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:24:14 +0800</lastBuildDate>
 <generator>winningman</generator>
 <item>
 <title>Recent Picks - Keflavik v Grindalvik TG Over 3</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processPicks.asp</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processPicks.asp</guid> 
 <description> Keflavik v Grindalvik TG Over 3, Orebro v Elfsborg TG Over 2.25, Helsingborg v Hacken TG Over 2.5, *Tokyo Verdy -0.25 v Tokushima Vortis, *Kashiwa Reysol -0.5 v JEF United...</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:24:14 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title> FIFA World Cup, South Africa 2010 - Group Previews</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=130</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=130</guid> 
 <description> Group A - South Africa, France, Uruguay Mexico">
</div>
  <strong><u>Group A</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
  South Africa, France, Uruguay Mexico
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>France</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Looking at the teams that make up the group, it would be just too easy to say
  the French will qualify. It could get
  trickier than that A quick glance at World Cup historyy show that France have not
  enjoyed playing outside the European continent - the most recent in World Cup
  Korea-Japan 2002 where they went early without even scoring a single goal.
  They barely made it to this year's tournament and only qualified under
  controversial circumstances in a play-off with the Republic
  of Ireland and they could again find themselves going home early in 2010. A French
  team in transition should prepare themselves well if they are to come up tops in a
  groups where the other teams play better under the sun
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Mexico</strong>
</div>
<div>
  In the last 6 World Cups that they were involved in, Mexico have always progressed beyond the
  group stage of the competition. It would not be too far fetched for them to repeat
  that this year. It helps that the current Mexican team are a talented bunch of
  players who have so far impressed in a recent friendlies including the one against England even though they
  lost 3-1.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Uruguay</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Uruguay will most likely give their all to progress from a very tough group by
  standards. In their last appearance, the South Americans did not go past the group
  stage. However, if you read their tournament history, you will find that after an
  early exit in a World Cup, they made up for it in the next tournament by progressing beyond the group stages. A
  curious trend, but a repeat is something the Uruguayans would no doubt welcome.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>South Africa</strong>
</div>
<div>
When the privilege of hosting the World Cup was awarded to South Africa, many questioned
  their pedigree as a footballing nation. From what transpired between and now
  reinforced that doubt. They have not really impressed in warm-up matches and could
  struggle. Conspiracy theorist would claim that the hosts would no doubt qualify to
  maintain local interest in the competition. While it is true that all World Cup
  hosts have so far qualified to the knock-out stages before this, does it really mean
  that early exit for the hosts will never, ever happen? South Africa are probably the weakest of the four countries who make the group and would take a collosal effort from them to make it alive from Group A
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Last words on Group A</strong>
</div>
<div>
  A Mexican fiesta could toast the French.<br>
  <br>
  <div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupB-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group B - Greece, South Korea, Nigeria, Argentina">
</div>

  <strong><u>Group B</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
  Greece, South Korea, Nigeria, Argentina
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Argentina</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Argentina, despite their indifferent form, are stil considered favourites to
  considered favourites to become World Champions. Progress to the next round
  should not be a problem for Maradona's men, but, they may not last long after
  that. A stuttering qualification campaign in which they triumph not because of
  Maradona's tactical brilliance, but because of the quality of the individuals
  that make up the team. The last time Maradona was involved in the World Cup
  (USA 94), they were knocked out in the group stage and ironically, Nigeria and
  Greece were also in the same group.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Nigeria</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Nigeria progressed to the first knock-out round in 1994 by winning their group
  which saw Argentina leave the tournament in disgrace. Since then, they have
  qualified for three straight World Cups since 1994 before missing out in 2006
  They may not be the strongest of the African countries on show and were
  unimpressive in the<br>
   last African Nations Cup but with continental advantage they have a good
  chance of qualifying from this group
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>South Korea</strong>
</div>
<div>
   By far, the best of Asia in this World Cup, South Korea however, have a
  bad World Cup record except for the 2002 edition when they were co-host. If
  the group was made up of another European country instead of Nigeria, South
  Korea's progression to the next round would almost be assured. A good
  performance against Nigeria & Greece could secure their progression
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Greece</strong>
</div>
<div>
  This is Greece's second World Cup since 1994, in which they finished bottom.
  It is highly unlikely that they surprise neutrals as they are up against
  opposition with so much advantage over them. If Greece avoid two straight
  defeats then only the third and final game will decide the top two teams
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Last words on Group B</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Continental advantage could be vital and it would be Messi for Argentina<br>
  <br>
  <div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupC-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group C - Algeria, United States Slovenia, England">
</div>

  <strong><u>Group C</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
  Algeria, United States Slovenia, England
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>England</strong>
</div>
<div>
  The time is ripe for England to make an appearance in a major final. Hence
  qualification from a relatively easy group should set England on it's way is
  no reason for England not to qualify top of this group. However, they never
  made it past the quarterfinals stage of a World Cup held outside e (2002,
  1986, 1970, 1962). This team also reached the quarterfinals in e (2002, 1986,
  1970, 1962). This team also reached the quarterfinals in 2006 but this time
  indications are they are likely to finish at least one better in this
  tournament, as they normally do in subsequent World Cups, after a quarterfinal
  exit four years before. ournament, as they normally do in subsequent World
  Cups, after a erfinal exit four years before for them, England are unlikely to
  meet any heavyweights until after erfinals, IF they reach that far
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Slovenia</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Surprise qualifier to the tournament at the expense of Czech Republic. This is
  their second World Cup and their pedigree is still unknown. However nia
  could still have a few surprises up their sleeves and the non-European s would
  do well to be on their guard nia boast a few players that ply their trade in
  major European leagues and minorities, they have nothing to lose.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>USA</strong> 
</div>
<div>
  World Cup 1990, the United States have never achieved back-to-back nation at
  the same stage of the tournament. Yes, the Red, White & Blue were
  eliminated at the group stage in Germany 2006. But, take a closer look at the
  United States, besides Landon Donovan and Clint Dempsey, the United States do
  not possess all-round quality especially at the back. This was exposed in a
  recent friendly against the Czech Republic where they conceded 3 times in the
  second half, thus losing 2-4. cond half, thus losing 2-4. Likely to lose to
  England but decent results against Slovenia and Algeria could ntee
  qualification to<br>
   last 16 after early elimination in the 2006 edition. However, it would
  not be much of a surprise if they struggle against Slovenia.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Algeria</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Algeria's two previous World Cup experience in the 80s and have never
  gone beyond oup stage. Least likely to advance though could get a decent
  result against nia or US
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Last words on Group C</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Dempsey could still make it home in time for Independence Day<br>
  <br><div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupD-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group D - Australia, Serbia, Ghana Germany">
</div>

  <strong><u>Group D</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
   Australia, Serbia, Ghana Germany
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Germany</strong>
</div>
<div>
   3 time champions Germany are an assured choice to advance to the last
  16. Since the last time they were crowned World Champions in 1990 (then West
  Germany) Germany have progressed to t least the quarterfinals of every World
  Cup. In 2006, as hosts, they finished ird and the last time they finished
  third (1970), Germany went on to win the ubsequent World Cup (1974). Most
  likely to meet a South American team in the uarterfinals should they advance
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Ghana</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Ghana, Serbia & Australia all have a good chance of making the next round.
  The frican team may struggle against European opponents so the best bet for
  them progress is a win over the Australians and hope that other results cancel
  each ther. This Ghanaian team could be the best they have had so far. This is
  only eir second appearance but still could be a real threat.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Serbia</strong>
</div>
<div>
  The team that pipped France to automatic qualification have a decent shot of
  reaching the<br>
   quarterfinals, if they avoid England in the last 16. Another team that
  has qualified to beyond the group stages each time they've been knocked out in
  the group stages in previous tournament. Serbia needs to step up their game
  against Germany to progress while making sure they do not lose the remaining
  two matches.
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Australia</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Englands's weaker cousins. Australia are most likely to struggle against the 2
  uropean & South African countries. They were denied a place in the
  uarterfinals amidst much controversional four years ago, but progress to the
  nock-out this time looks unlikely
</div>
<div>
   
</div>
<div>
  <strong>Last words on Group D</strong>
</div>
<div>
  Michael Essien would be cursing his luck but would soon have Nemanja Vidic for
  ompany<br>
  <br>
  <div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupE-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group E - Japan, Cameroon, Netherlands, Denmark">
</div>

<div>
  &nbsp;
  <p>

  <strong><u>Group E</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
  Japan, Cameroon, Netherlands, Denmark
</div>
  &nbsp;
  <p>

<b>Netherlands</b><br>
After Spain, the Netherlands boast a handful of talented individual players such as Arjen Robben (doubtful with slight hamstring problems), Robin van Persie, Rafael van der Vaart & Wesley Sneijder, to name a few. Naturally, they would be favourites to nail down a place in the last-16. In the modern era of the World Cup, Netherlands have not failed to progress. However, Cameroon or Denmark could finish above them if the Dutch get careless. A place in the quarter final or beyond beckons if they progress.</p>
  <p>

<b>Denmark</b><br>
The Danes have not had an impressive build-up to their opening match, losing to Australia and SOuth Africa recently in a friendly, albeit by a single goal. But, do not write off Denmark yet as in three previous World Cup appearances, they have made it at least to the last 16. But even if they do, it is unlikely that they progress further here in SOuth Africa, outside the European continent. The first match against Netherlands would be crucial. If they avoid a defeat, they could easily progress as group winners.<p>

<b>Cameroon</b><br>
Samuel Eto'o may be the most recognized player in the Cameroon team, but he could also be their Archiles heel. In the build up to the World Cup, Eto'o have time and time again tried to remind us that Samuel Eto'o IS Cameroon. If so, then this African team would not go far in this tournament. Cameroon featured in 5 World Cups but have only progressed beyond the Group stages just once. With Japan the likely candidate to finish bottom, Cameroon would need a decent result against the Danes to progress. <p>

<b>Japan</b><br>
Japan progressed from a relatively easy group when they were co-hosts in 2002 but did not make it past the group stages in 98 & 2006 when grouped with superior oppositions. With Netherlands, Denmark and Cameroon in the group, it is unlikely that they would make it to the last-16. The Japanese have not impressed in warm-up matches and the pressure is on them to perform. They could crack under the hot sun. 

<p>

<b>Last words on Group E</b><br>
Danish delight as the sun sets on Africa

<p>&nbsp;</p>
  <div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupF-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group F - New Zealand, Paraguay. Slovakia, Italy">
</div>

  &nbsp;
<div>

  <strong><u>Group F</u></strong>
</div>
<div>
  New Zealand, Paraguay. Slovakia, Italy
</div>
  <p>

<b>Italy</b><br>
Oddly, as defending champions, the Azzuris have seldom progressed beyond the last-16. But an unlikely exit at the group stage would be incomprehensible. Though dumped in the 1st round of the recent Confederations Cup, the Italians have not failed to progress beyond the Group stages in eight consecutive World Cups.</p>

<p>

<b>Slovakia</b><br>
As part of Czechoslovakia, they reached the quarterfinals of Italia 90. This will be their first tournament as an independent country. Topped their qualifying group and could prove to be a surprise challenge for group winners.

<p>

<b>Paraguay</b><br>
The third automatic qualifier in CONMEBOL could struggle in the competition. They boast a strong form at home but outside their comfort zone, wins are few and far. Interestingly, they have always finished in a lower rank than in previous World Cups, so very likely to go home early.

<p>

<b>New Zealand</b><br>
If their Confederations Cup appearance is used as a benchmark, little or nothing is expected from them. Finished bottom in all their Confederations Cup appearances so one suspects it will be the same story in their frist appreance in the World Cup. However, it is possible for them to pull of at least one good result in the tournament.

<p>

<b>Last words on Group F</b><br>
It's Italy again for the Slovaks

<p>

&nbsp;
<div id=imagecontainer>
<img src=rantimages/groupG-SA2010.jpg width=250 alt="Group G - Korea DPR, Portugal, Ivory Coast, Brazil</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:04:19 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title> Napoli seek elusive win</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=128</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=128</guid> 
 <description> A win over Fiorentina, who they've already beaten ...</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:29:22 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title> United look to finish off the Italian job</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=127</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=127</guid> 
 <description> Rooney may start from the bench and if so, Milan s...</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:00:21 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title> Bordeaux seek to extend lead at the top</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=126</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=126</guid> 
 <description> League leaders Bordeaux lead Ligue 1 on goal diffe...</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:44:43 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
 <title> Over in Hannover</title>
 <link>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=125</link> 
 <guid>http://www.oddstreak.com/trialist/processEvents.asp?cid=125</guid> 
 <description> Hannover are 2nd from bottom and were thrashed 4-1...</description>
 <author>wm@oddstreak.com</author>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:43:41 +0800</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
